Bushmills Red Bush

Bushmills Red Bush

Originally published 21/09/2017

2014 saw Diageo sell Bushmills distillery to Casa Cuervo, the family-run tequila company responsible for the biggest selling tequila brand in the world, Jose Cuervo. Diageo has to be praised for significant investment at Bushmills allowing for increased production and a greater marketing expenditure that led to considerable sales growth, particularly in the US.

In fact, the distillery has been running at pretty much capacity for the last few years. The only downside was that Diageo seemed to play safe with the whiskey. The delectable 12 year old rum cask editions put to bed, the single barrel bourbon and sherry cask editions retired too. Instead a core range of Original and Black Bush blends, 10 year, 16 year and 21 year single malts became the norm with variation of the core only coming through the Distillery Reserve 12 year old, the 400th Anniversary 1608 expression and the thankfully retired Bushmills Irish Honey spirit drink.

When Casa Cuervo took over though there were rumblings escaping the distillery that big changes were on the way and for the better. Apparently, the new owners didn't think the 12 year old Distillery Reserve was a good enough reason to visit the distillery... rumours of bottle your own single barrel cask strength expressions started to echo around the distillery walls.

Fellow enthusiasts looked forward to the end of chill filtration, to bottling at the industry minimum of 40% abv and to the end of e150 caramel colouring being added to every batch. However, the excitement died down and the status quo continued.

If this all sounds as though I'm writing this with a sense of disappointment... well you'd be right. Bushmills has the basis of being a truly special Irish distillery that so far owners past and present seem to be missing.

Anyway, to the present. March 2017 saw the release of Casa Cuervo's newest Bushmills expression exclusively in the US - Red Bush! Maybe Russia would have been a better launching stage with a name like that (sorry, cheap national stereotyping there, but it does genuinely sound a bit 1980's Red Heat era...so no, I'm not a huge fan of the name). Here's what Colum Egan, Bushmills Master Distiller had to say about the launch of Red Bush:

“While we’ve been innovating with our aged whiskeys for centuries, we’re excited to embark on a journey with the millennial drinker. Maturing the whiskey exclusively in first fill bourbon barrels creates an extremely smooth spirit that will resonate with frequent bourbon fans and first time Irish whiskey drinkers.”  

Egan adds: “Bushmills Red Bush personifies the gritty Irish character and adds a sense of adventure and fun to our portfolio, further defining the confident, courageous and independent spirit we’ve seen for generations at Bushmills.”

This is the type of marketing guff that sends shivers down my spine... much in the same way the Highland Parks' recent meanderings into Dragons and Legends fills me with dread. Seriously, what I want to hear a Master Distiller tell me is that they have set out to make the finest whisk(e)y available at the price point – not spout marketing gibberish about gritty character, confidence and independence. Maybe that is why I'm not a successful businessman because I always thought if your product was excellent it would have no problem selling itself.

So what about the whiskey itself you ask? It's a 4-year-old blend of 70% grain and 30% malt whiskies that have been fully matured in 1st fill bourbon barrels. Although you won't find any of that info on the actual bottle, that info came courtesy of a distillery insider (very secret agent eh!). It is coloured, chill filtered and bottled at the Bushmills de facto 40% ABV and at present costs £24 a bottle at the distillery (until stocks run out – it is selling so well in the States that a European launch has been put on hold) although I have seen it for sale in the US for $17.

Bushmills Red Bush Review

Colour: Caramel induced amber

On the nose: Quite floral, the higher quantity of grain spirit is evident. Some stewed apples, a little melon and a hint of malt biscuit.

In the mouth: Vanilla and honey sweetness right at the front of the tongue. Some nutmeg and oak. The finish is short, dry and oaky.


To say that this is the best that Casa Cuervo could come up with as the first new Bushmills expression for nearly 10 years (outside of global travel retail) is frankly very disappointing, to put it mildly. It certainly is not going to reinvent the whiskey wheel. Personally, I don't really see its purpose as it is not distinct enough from Bushmills Original White Label. I would surmise it would be hard to tell the difference between the two in a blind tasting. I was told that this whiskey was 'designed' for shots, mixing and introducing first time whisk(e)y drinkers to the brand... something I think the Original was more than capable of doing.

As far as I'm concerned this is just a waste of whiskey stock and for me does little to develop the brand.

Score: 3/10

If you’d like to support my humble site you can do so following the ‘buy me a coffee’ link. Thanks for reading.

Comments from original post

  1. Jason Hayes

    Harsh….but true. I have the full Bushmill range in the cabinet but this will not be joining them after trying a sample! If this is what Bushmills want to use to get first time whiskey drinkers to try their brand then its not going to encourage them to try more.

  2. Jim

    As an occasional drinker of whiskey or bourbon, I very much like the taste of Red Bush. I formerly preferred Maker’s Mark, a Kentucky bourbon, but find Reb Bush to be much more mellow and flavorful. I also prefer Bushmills 16 y.o. single malt whiskey, which has a bit more “bite” that the more mellow Red. According to the old latin phrase, “Degustibus non desputande!”, or “personal taste cannot be disputed!”

    1. Jim,

      You are completely correct about personal taste…all whiskey is a personal journey and I’m glad you appreciated the Red Bush.
      From my point of view it is just not radically different from the original white label and considering it’s price point here in Ireland it is a bit too expensive for my liking….horses for courses though!

  3. Charles

    Red Bush is a decent alternative, in the US, to other Irish beverages insofar as it can be had on the cheap. It’s nowhere near as satisfying as Black Bush, and it has zero character, but for those of us trying to stretch our whiskey dollar, I’ll drink RB with ice and save the good stuff (or at least the better stuff) for special occasions, like when the sun sets or when the mail arrives. Bottoms up!

  4. Scott

    HI, From Canada and just bought Red Bush for the first time. Been a rum drinker most of my life but in the last year or so i started sipping Irish whiskey’s, Like them all so far. I find the Red Bush very smooth and easy to drink. Nice on ice. Just an extra flavor, what’s wrong with that? Nothing great nothing bad.

  5. Phil Phucas

    I agree with that reason for making it seems absurd, but the product is solidly drinkable. It’s not trying to be something it’s not. I can tell the difference between the white and red, the red loses a little of the distinct Bushmills finish. With all that said, I like it and hope to be able to carry it in my cabinet regularly.

  6. Darryn

    “We’re embarking on a journey with the Millennial drinker…..”
    That, and the fact that it was originally sold in the U.S. only tells me who Bushmills was targeting with this expression. From what I can gather, they’ve succeeded. The Millennial drinker came upon whiskey as a trend, with sales of Bourbons, Rye, and Scotch increasing. So, why not an Irish whiskey, designed the way Millennial Americans drink, which is shooting and mixing? To an older, more experienced drinker, no; we won’t see any real difference.

  7. Darryn

    I won’t be trying it, unless I happen upon a store that has a tasting; or they start selling pints of it. Since I’m an experienced drinker, it just wouldn’t be enough of a difference to me. If it was non-chill filtered, and had a minimal amount of e150, THAT would’ve made some difference!

  8. Steve

    Not a fan of sherry influence; therefore, I like the Red Bush more than the Original white label. This is good over ice, which is what this whiskey is made for.

  9. Chirard

    Wow, what a poor conclusion, dude – 3/10 really? It’s good stuff, hits its mark dead-on. I’m not a fan of the sherry either, so this is great!


Popular Posts